Writing For Research

Discussion QuestionWhat ar some of the typical errors that a investigator should look for when reviewing journalsResearches published on scientific journals have underg fight a review process in to determine if the top dog member had followed the established rules and standards of empirical inquiry , thus it is presume that when a investigate is published , it has passed the scrutiny of experts in its field . b arly , this is not always true to form reviewers do not always scrutinize query articles for the lack of measure and exploit . Moreover , some interrogationes are published in journals that moreover have very few reviewers (Martella , Nelson Marchand-Martella 1999 . Therefore , as consumers of look , we must still be alert to the executable errors that a query article may haveIn reviewing journals , the first liaison to discern is how the research questions have been stated and whether it is supported by seemly belles-lettres . Sometimes , due to the limited countersign length , the background and literature review of the subject area is presented as one section , a well-written article must take hold literature that supports the research questions whether it be theory or research establish (Martella , Nelson Marchand-Martella , 1999 . The next part to inspect is the methods section of the field of honor , the try out methods , research jut out instruments , statistical analysis must be clearly identified , and that it should be the most appropriate for the design of the study .

! Moreover the research methods should coincide with the research questions , if the research intends to prove causality , wherefore the statistical tools and the design of the research methods should to a fault hightail it to establishing causality . How the data had been analyzed and the discussions presented by the author of the results of the study should also be inspected . The results should be accurately presented and the discussion should dissolvent the research questions of the study , likewise it should also be see in the light of previous researches and findings . The resultant and recommendations section are usually filled with error peculiarly when the researcher makes conclusions and recommendations that are beyond the scope of the study (Martella , Nelson Marchand-Martella , 1999ReferenceMartella , R , Nelson , R Marchand-Martella , N (1999 . Research methods : Learning tobecome a panoptic of life research consumer . Needham Heights , MA : Allyn Bacon...If yo u want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay